https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKY1u5aHGBk
can the true nature be known before
knowing
the illusion
so again let us invite some opinions
what do people think what is your
experience
did you did you
come to know about your true nature
before knowing that everything is
inclusion
or you had to first you know somebody
had to convince you that look everything
is inclusion
only then you
came to know about your true nature what
happened in your life
boomerang is saying no rajiv is saying
knowing the illusion is optional
guru true nature cannot be known at all
what are you doing on this path then i
am asking siddhanth this path promises
to
give you the knowledge of self which is
your true nature
what are you doing here shilph is saying
true nature is not known so what is
known then
rajiv is saying both true natural
illusion cannot be known it looks like i
am wrong now many people are saying it
cannot be known only ignorance which
considers the illusion as true can be
removed paramji this saying needs to
know the illusion
prajit is saying when everything is
removed then what remains is true nature
she'll be saying illusion is known so it
looks like there is a little bit of
controversy now
money is saying knowing is an illusion
so to know anything illusion is to be
known when can be without it
but not no it's a very good answer but
if people don't consider
self-realization as knowledge what do
they consider what do what do they think
self-realization is not knowledge
who am i
can this not be known pandering is
saying knowing illusion is optional
actually that is also my opinion but you
see there can be more
opinions here so
that is why
um
in the 3d program we first start with
the self-realization
who you are is told first
which is simply the knowledge of
self is simply refutation of the blind
beliefs about the self
that i am born that i will die that you
know i have a shape and size these
things are removed this is self
realization so you know something is
known here when people say no it cannot
be known it cannot be experienced
directly you see there is no direct
experience of the self
or the experiencer
so this can be achieved without going
into the details of the illusion this
can be achieved
without
bringing in the definition of true and
false
we simply assume that the world and the
bodies are true
but we
can still
remove them from the essence
non-essential then in the second step we
can find out that the non-essential is
not constant it is changing forms and
names
created by the mind
and so
then we come to know it is an illusion
peramji is saying self-realization is
the true knowledge
yes you see there will be opinions you
know what is the last knowledge
what is it that once it is known
everything is known
we do talk about self-realization as if
it is knowledge it is
when people are saying that you know it
cannot be known
that means that you know cannot be known
through senses or intellect or things
like that the self will never be known
as an experience you cannot experience
it you are the one whose egg who
experiences everything you are the
experiencer if it can be experienced it
is not you it is your being this is the
knowledge i am happy with this knowledge
actually
so there seems to be a little confusion
about the word known no knowing and
known so when the word known is used in
in the
for formal way organizations of the
experience in the memory that is the
knowledge
then yes the experience is never
organized in the memory it is not to be
found in the memory
it is the witness of the memories so in
this way there is no knowledge of it but
self-realization is an organization in
the memory what is the what is the
organization consists of
not this not that negative knowledge and
knowing this
remembering this will be called
awareness in our terminology
the difference is very tiny you see very
subtle try to grasp the subtleness of it
you can easily call self-realization as
one kind of knowledge you know negative
knowledge
but you cannot say that the experiencer
is known directly there there needs to
be little bit of
discrimination there it is very tiny
so
fortunately we had this question this
came up many people have
answered
from their own perspective
which one do you take
i think both answers are correct but
you know in in this
question we are asking about the process
of taking knowledge and how to know the
true nature whether this can be known
before we can go on into the illusion
simple common sense answer should be
there
there are more opinions yeshra's saying
this can be known that the experiencer
cannot be known
that is what i call negative knowledge
it cannot be found in the world it
cannot be found in the body it has no
shape no size all negative
but still it is knowledge you see yes
the experiencer does not make a direct
impression in the memory this color that
sound no that kind of knowledge will
never be found not an object no
objective knowledge very good now rajid
saying the knowledge of the self reveals
the illusion the knowledge of its
working is optional vipin is saying a
process of knowing illusion will bring
surrender which can strengthen the
abiding into nature
i don't know this can be a big topic
that when the illusion is given first
what will happen to the seeker
and that that depends on their
constitution actually and this is my
experience in the field of teaching and
the path of knowledge
and then it is sometimes harmful if
people are told your life is a lie it is
fake your body is fake your relations
are garbage
whatever you think about yourself and
about others totally cooked up stuff
obviously they will be depressed they
won't like it they will hate their guru
there are some people like this and they
laugh at these people who call the world
as illusion when they see the suffering
and the issues in the society and their
own condition is of suffering so
they you cannot accept the suffering as
an illusion it is even considered
unethical when one guru is sitting there
and laughing at the suffering look a
play a drama a dream and they then
attack the guru by saying that look if
you were starving
if you are getting killed if you are
getting abused then you will come to
know it is real so to avoid this kind of
disaster we provide self-knowledge first
once this base is made then
not telling that the experience is the
illusion it does not have any
bad effect on the mind at least this is
my opinion that is how the program is
designed you must have seen then we
actually
remove all doubts by saying that
in the illusion the illusion works
the truth won't work in the illusion in
the illusion in the play only the script
works you cannot show the camera in the
movie you see
like they say the illusion breaks
only the special effects
explosions they work there nicely
so play the play fully knowing that it
is a play you suffer the suffering and
love your friends and kill your enemies
is all fine now know what you are
then this
makes the nondual
knowledge acceptable for an average
seeker
there are some special seekers and for
them
perfectly okay that everything is a lie
actually they laugh at it
they are released by this knowledge
they're liberated
finally i don't need to worry about
anything they say finally i don't need
to worry about death and disease and
disability and all this
the
major sufferings of a human being i
don't know who i am but you know it's
all fake so no problem at all then they
go ahead and explore the illusion
they are called tantrics they love it
actually
they become lovers of the devi not
bothering about who am i
now it has some side effects but it's
okay
depends on how much impurity you have
how much attachments you have to this
illusion if there are too many
impurities too many attachments
then telling that everything in the
illusion has a bad effect
so we send them away
go and do something yoga or something
you see chant the mantras and sing the
bhajan then come back after 20 years i
tell them self knowledge
very easy very easy no side effects at
all except in few people so let's go
forward
how can a seeker experience oneness
so who can tell me how to experience
oneness yeshua is saying there is no
process if oneness can be experienced
there is again experience appears to
this
very good
that is all you need to say
there is one line explanation one line
it is not an oneness is not an
experience you see otherwise it would
also come and go it can also change when
people can have one person can have it
other may not have it
but oneness is the nature of the
existence it is one you cannot have
anything else except oneness and if it
is experienced it will become two
it will be divided into two
that is what is happening the existence
is trying to know what i am
am i
and in the process ends up dividing
itself because it cannot be seen as a
whole
still it can be known as a whole
and you can be that you can be the one
how to do that you're already it just
remove your ignorance that i'm not the
one how to remove the ignorance path of
knowledge
No comments:
Post a Comment